Monday, January 24, 2011

HW2 Prob 2

Is anyone else getting a huge algebraic quagmire whenever trying to incorporate switching loss, as well as conduction loss, into their perturbation/linearization steps?

I'm really doubting this is even possible.

4 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Perturbation/linearization is not required to obtain the large signal switch average model.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yea Dan I am,
    I can solve for V1, as it should be unchanged from equation 7.157 solved in the book. However, I cannot simplify I2 to be able to correspond to the same turns ratio. I'm not convinced it is possible either.
    -Rob

    ReplyDelete
  4. Right, I missed the large signal part. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.